Possible pitfalls using FAST MIRROR

Have questions about Backup4all, or having problems using it? Ask here for help.
rgdudley
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 9:04 pm

Possible pitfalls using FAST MIRROR

Post by rgdudley »

I am just wondering what possible problems I might run into using fast mirror for backing up a external hard drive containing 30 thousand pictures. Currently I make two backups using mirror without the FAST option. I recall having had some problems using that option in the past.

Adrian (Softland)
Posts: 1946
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:46 pm

Re: Possible pitfalls using FAST MIRROR

Post by Adrian (Softland) »

Hi,

There should be no problems. The Fast Mirror will back up only new and modified files from sources. That will result in a faster backup.

rgdudley
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 9:04 pm

Re: Possible pitfalls using FAST MIRROR

Post by rgdudley »

I guess I am wondering if I delete some files from the source disk, will those also be deleted from the destination disk using the fast option. I think that was the problem I had in the past. I would want them to be deleted from the destination so it is an exact copy of the source.

Richard

Adrian (Softland)
Posts: 1946
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:46 pm

Re: Possible pitfalls using FAST MIRROR

Post by Adrian (Softland) »

Hi,

If you want to also remove from destination the files deleted from sources, you need to select the "Remove excluded or deleted files" option from Backup Properties->Type->Mirror.

rgdudley
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 9:04 pm

Re: Possible pitfalls using FAST MIRROR

Post by rgdudley »

Great. Thanks.

I also assume that any alterations made to the destination outside of backup&4all will not be noticed by b4a when using the fast option.

Adrian (Softland)
Posts: 1946
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:46 pm

Re: Possible pitfalls using FAST MIRROR

Post by Adrian (Softland) »

Hi,

Yes, that is correct. Backup4all won't monitor the destination all the time, to track any change made outside Backup4all.
It is supposed you won't manually alter the backup in destination.

rgdudley
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 9:04 pm

Re: Possible pitfalls using FAST MIRROR

Post by rgdudley »

OK. I have been using fast mirror and it seems to save hours of time.
Now can backup in a few minutes rather than several hours... so I backup more frequently! That's good.

However, I understand that at some point I should make a full backup without the FAST option... to get all files rewritten occasionally... is that reasonable?

If so what is the best way to do that without confusing the "catalog" of the FAST option approach.

Should I just use the same backup set and occasionally turn off the fast option, or should I create a different backup set (without fast) and run that occasionally.

What is the best and safest protocol? :?:

Adrian (Softland)
Posts: 1946
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:46 pm

Re: Possible pitfalls using FAST MIRROR

Post by Adrian (Softland) »

Hi,

For Mirror backup type, there is no need to run a complete backup from time to time.
Let me explain why: there are no file versions (for Mirror type). Any modified source file will overwrite the existing file version in destination.

If you want, you can run a repair backup from time to time. That means the backup in destination will be tested against the catalog and all missing files will be backed up again. (in case anyone deleted some files from destination)