Include/exclude Filters

Tell us what you think about Backup4all and what would make it even better.
Post Reply
justinhow
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2023 1:23 pm

Include/exclude Filters

Post by justinhow »

I recently realised that I had accidentily added a filter that I had intended to be an "exclude" filter but had actually added as an "include". The effect was that it removed 100 GBytes of (backup) data from a cloud drive and that I also took many days to realise this problem.
I therefore think it should be made very obvious when adding a filter to a job, as the unintended consequence of getting it wrong can be very bad. Maybe highlight (using different colours) the include/exclude field to draw ones attention to it.
Also when creating a B4All "system wide" filter (file/options...) you should be able to set the preference for whether when adding it to a job the filter should default to either include or exclude, as nearly always any added filter is for one or other and not both. This would reduce the likelihood of adding it to a B4All job in the wrong mode.
My point is that for a complex product like B4All with many options, this particular setting (include/exclude filter) is one of the most crucial and should therefore somehow be made difficult to get wrong/miss.
Using B4All (v9.8 build 725) on Windows Server 2019

Adrian (Softland)
Posts: 1901
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:46 pm

Re: Include/exclude Filters

Post by Adrian (Softland) »

Hi,

I'm sorry to hear about your incident.

We will think about your suggestions.
Do you know you can monitor your backups remotely with Backup4all Monitor? You can read more here: https://www.backup4all.com/backup4all-monitor.html

Post Reply