Is the 10058 error a sign of a larger conspiracy against secure file transfers?

[Agencycitte]

Could it be that the persistent 10058 error is more than just a configuration issue? What if it's an indicator of a deliberate attempt to undermine SFTP protocols, forcing users back to less secure methods? Let's explore the absurd possibilities!

[Agencycitte]

In an age where data is considered one of the most valuable assets, could relying on backup solutions like Backup4All be indicative of a deeper issue in data management practices? Are we merely masking poor organizational habits and systemic inefficiencies with these tools, rather than addressing the root causes of data loss and mismanagement?